Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

KaVir · 02-18-2003, 02:46 PM

And how exactly can his standards make a difference, when he's not even logging on to the muds?

Alajha opposed it as well, and Brianna suggested he might consider changing the name. Perhaps you should read threads before posting to them in future?

Well, what the heck - if you can't beat em, join em!

<span style='font-size:17pt;line-height:100%'>LOOK, AN ACTUAL LOSER MUD OF THE DAY</span>

Alsherok

Website:
Telnet: alsherok.net:5500

At the point of writing this, Alsherok is such a failure that it's not even ranked! It's a "fantasy" mud with "An original 9,000+ room world" - and it even has a "Mostly Original" world, complete with Midgaard!

Worth checking out! :)

(Oh, and just to clarify, by "loser" I'm referring to the dictionary definition of "one that loses especially consistently", and by "failure" I mean "lack of success", both within the context of the Top Mud Sites rankings - just like Brody has done).

02-18-2003, 02:46 PM	#79
KaVir Legend Join Date: Apr 2002 Name: Richard Home MUD: God Wars II Posts: 2,052	And how exactly can his standards make a difference, when he's not even logging on to the muds? Alajha opposed it as well, and Brianna suggested he might consider changing the name. Perhaps you should read threads before posting to them in future? Well, what the heck - if you can't beat em, join em! <span style='font-size:17pt;line-height:100%'>LOOK, AN ACTUAL LOSER MUD OF THE DAY</span> Alsherok Website: Telnet: alsherok.net:5500 At the point of writing this, Alsherok is such a failure that it's not even ranked! It's a "fantasy" mud with "An original 9,000+ room world" - and it even has a "Mostly Original" world, complete with Midgaard! Worth checking out! :) (Oh, and just to clarify, by "loser" I'm referring to the dictionary definition of "one that loses especially consistently", and by "failure" I mean "lack of success", both within the context of the Top Mud Sites rankings - just like Brody has done).