|
But Brody did offend me, and he's made it quite clear that he doesn't care.
You specifically said that you found what Brody did to be "perfectly fine", and that it was "Almost too bad those muds who don't even make it to the 80-100 section can't also be underdogged/dark horsed/spotlighted as well".
Well, I "underdogged" your mud, and suddenly it was no longer fine - it was now "offensive and crude".
So please explain why it's "perfectly fine" for Brody to post material that offends me, but "offensive and crude" for me to post exactly the same style of material when it offends you.
He didn't respond to my valid points. Pointing out that what he's doing is offensive is not an attack. Pointing out that what he's doing does not achieve his claimed objective is not an attack.
I've already pointed out that we're not the only ones. Apparently Brody isn't the only one who ignores facts that get in the way of his argument.
|