As always, a couple points to make you aware of Logos...
1) I never included a date in my notes. The reason being is that I didn't know you were going to trace the logs. So I don't know how you can conclude that now I'm "claiming" something else.
2) You assumed a scenario and set forth to prove it based off information you didn't have. That makes a lot of sense.
It's sorta funny that the logs don't go back that far. After you use your "proof" which doesn't apply I provide a more specific range and it's now "not there". Yeah, I'm the one who's full of crap.
Rundvelt, who says "When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me."
|