![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 88
![]() |
In Wes Platt's latest Backstage column, he suggests that players prefer a rigid storyline than an open-ended one (under certain conditions).
You can read this article . Synozeer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 123
![]() |
Brody, how would you apply that concept to situations in which characters are on opposing sides in a conflict? Would you consistently seek a win-win flavor of ending, or would you mainly just try to be fair in choosing which side wins? And if every character always wins, would it be correct to say there is never any conflict in the first place?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Legend
|
![]() Burr asks:That's a great question. The column specifically deals with plots and storylines developed as a staffer - so, it assumes the staffer is playing "the opposing side." However, as one might expect, multiple PC factions can end up vying for the same goal. In that case, I don't think it's reasonable (or particularly sane) to seek a win-win situation. Just try to be fair in determining who emerges victorious.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
great article I once saw, help?! | nass | MUD Administration | 1 | 09-16-2003 12:47 PM |
Interesting old article | Pris | MUD Administration | 0 | 07-17-2003 05:43 AM |
Excellent Article | Mason | Advanced MUD Concepts | 4 | 07-11-2002 03:05 PM |
New Article: Don't Forget the Cat | Synozeer | MUD Announcements | 0 | 05-23-2002 09:15 AM |
New Article: The End of the World and You | Synozeer | MUD Announcements | 2 | 04-26-2002 03:58 AM |
|
|