Top Mud Sites Forum Return to
Go Back   Top Mud Sites Forum > Mud Development and Administration > Legal Issues
Click here to Register

Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2004, 10:53 PM   #1
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 123
Burr is on a distinguished road
With such a license as I am musing on, the mere knowledge of a concept implies the right to use it.  However, the extent to commercial use allowable is limited by the extent to which the concept is applied commercially by its owner.  I.e., if the owner of a mudbase netted $1,000 from ventures using the mudbase, then anyone else could use the mudbase for ventures with a net gain of up to but not exceeding $1,000.  Furthermore, if someone produced a derivate of the mudbase and netted only $500 (which is within the limit allowed to them), anyone could use that derivate, but only for ventures netting up to $500.

This would be on a per person basis, such that an infinite number of persons could each earn up to the limit.  Organizational entities could earn over the limit, but any amount in excess of what may be distributed to the owners must be invested elsewhere or reinvested in the organization itself -- OR -- invested in the owner of the originating concept, thereby increasing the limit that can be earned by all in the subhierarchy.

Further, if one particular derivative shows more potential for success than the orginal concept, the owner of the original concept could invest in that derivative.  Due to the way the process works, the other investors in that derivative are allowed to make as much from it as the owner of the originating concept makes from that derivative.  (And if there are no intermediate derivatives, then they can flat out make as much as the owner of the original concept.)


Every application of a concept is going to be unique in one way or another, because at the very least, the situation to which it is applied is always unique.  Therefore, every specific application of a concept is in fact a new derivative of that concept.  This includes any specific applications of a concept made by the original owner of that concept.  With the licensing I described, the market value of the application can be distinguished from the market value of the originating concept by the original owner's personal ability and desire to apply his or her concept or derivatives thereof.

That last sentence is a large jump in logic on my part.  So it's almost certainly wrong, though it sounds right to me at the moment.  I really hate that feeling -- don't you?  In any case, such a license would be #### to manage.
Burr is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

A silly licensing idea, just for fun. - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crazy Idea Torren MUD Coding 2 02-25-2004 06:36 PM
Large vs Small (not in that sense silly!) Taniquetil MUD Builders and Areas 10 06-04-2003 10:36 AM
Ethical?  Licensing and accepting donations... DSer Legal Issues 11 01-02-2003 03:52 PM
New MUD Idea Letum Advanced MUD Concepts 17 01-01-2003 04:05 PM
NEW MUD IDEA FOR YOU! Ryunt Advertising for Staff 7 05-14-2002 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Style based on a design by Essilor
Copyright Top Mud 2014