08-29-2007, 09:52 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
I've noticed that some unflattering statements about people
are allowed to stand, and some unflattering statements about people are not. It's not always easy to tell when one or the other will happen. I'm still working on sussing out a pattern. Whether it's pattern-based or actually random, my frustration continues to rise at its arbitrariness. I was told in a chat that Lasher is very hypocritical because he forbids X but does X, but I don't think that hypocrisy is the deal. I think that there is a multiheaded ill-organized mess of moderation that occurs when rules are not explicitly laid out governing permitted content. I think Lasher might *seem* hypocritical when he, for example, engages in offtopic banter in a thread that has had posts deleted for offtopic banter. But in fact the problem is that his moderators are exercising editorial authority on their own scripts, and enforcing their own rules and interpretation of unwritten "understandings" on some people, but not on others. The whole thing is just disgusting and while I continue to exercise the patience being asked for while things get worked out, I think perhaps it is not too much to ask that dicretionary deletions and editings happen only in extreme cases *until* the formal written policies exist. Seems only fair that patience is asked of one group, restraint be expected of the other. -Crat |
08-29-2007, 09:59 AM | #22 |
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Name: Derek
Location: Orlando
Posts: 357
|
Re: Moderation
Fair point. Very valid. The first time. Second, third, fourth time? By then you already know.
There's a new team (newly active team at least) in place and we are working on it. So we can either close the forums while it's done or leave it as it is knowing that most people will use their own judgement, perhaps erring on the side of caution,and the forums can still be productive. Do you have a MUD? Do you have a rule that says "Do not hack my server?". Do you have a rule that says "Do not hunt me down, drive to my house and paint my car Orange?". This is a forum for discussion and promotion of MUDs. Discussions will get heated, but there is no room for blatant personal attacks adding absolutely nothing constructive to the discussion or posts that have no purpose other than to provoke someone. If someone needs a "rule" to see this then we'll provide it, but if that person decides TMS isn't the place for them in the meantime I can live with that too. If you're referring to the "f--k" example yesterday, nobody was moderated, nobody was scolded, code wasn't working that now is. ` |
08-29-2007, 10:00 AM | #23 |
Legend
|
Re: Moderation
There hasn't been active (or fully effective) moderation on this site in quite a long time, primarily because it never has had a real set of rules. It's safe to accept that the current moderator staff will be working up a set of guidelines and rules to live by for public consumption. Until then, rather than shutting the site down while we sort out the rules, I think it's a necessary evil that moderation will seem arbitrary - at least moderation is happening and the guidelines will be made available as soon as possible.
Thanks for your patience and understanding! |
08-29-2007, 10:10 AM | #24 |
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Name: Derek
Location: Orlando
Posts: 357
|
Re: Moderation
"You were told", "It might seen" .. convenient and courageous ways to put words into someone else's mouth while you get to be the author.
Keeping a 200+ post thread 100% on-topic is impossible. There was a brief and lighthearted banter which was quickly ended. Nobody was attacked, nobody was provoked, nobody was accused of anything and the discussion was back on track within minutes. If you don't see the difference, truly don't see the difference between that and the posts of yours that were removed, then we will never agree, your frustration level will continue to rise and you can move on safe and secure in the knowledge that you're not wasting any more of your time on a forum so poorly run. |
08-29-2007, 10:10 AM | #25 |
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Name: Richard
Home MUD: God Wars II
Posts: 2,052
|
Re: Moderation
When I was a moderator on the Advanced Mud Concepts forum, I wrote up a set of guidelines in a sticky post describing what was expected and what was acceptable - and although I was fairly strict about enforcing those guidelines, I don't recall every receiving complaints about my moderation.
I do think it would be beneficial to have a list of general posting guidelines for the site. Any forums with stricter posting guidelines could then add them as a sticky thread post. |
08-29-2007, 10:10 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 315
|
Re: Moderation
I feel you Samson, I truly do, your wisdom is touching. But why practice this grand wisdom within the small boundaries of an online forum?
We should do this big, ya know, the real deal. Lets sterilize all trolls, possibly euthanize the worst cases, or just get rid of them all, and the degenerates while at it, in the name of civility. We should appoint me as the fearless leader, and I'd hand out the task of 'moderating' the population at large to a few, possibly incapable, but highly motivated individuals who like to moderate just for the sake of moderating, or simply because they realize the greatness of the work ahead. We'd have heaven on earth in no time. I swear, it'd be the solution to all of man's problems, and even better, when we fix the problem at the root, moderation for all online forums would no longer be required because everyone left would be a sweet and obedient little forum user, the grandest of grand wet dreams of every forum admin. Send me a PM to work out the details? |
08-29-2007, 10:22 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
That there is a difference between your sense of humor
and mine is beyond doubt. I suggest that the primary difference is yours is never in danger of moderation. As to your sarcastic reference to my cowardice (does that count as flaming?), if it pleases you I'll allocute to full responsibility for the statements, since I will not "out" someone I was chatting with. Let me rephrase it then. ------------------------------------------------------------ I might have thought that Lasher is very hypocritical because he forbids X but does X, but I don't think that hypocrisy is the deal. I think that there is a multiheaded ill-organized mess of moderation that occurs when rules are not explicitly laid out governing permitted content. I think Lasher might *seem* hypocritical when he, for example, engages in offtopic banter in a thread that has had posts deleted for offtopic banter. ------------------------------------------------------------ -Crat |
08-29-2007, 10:43 AM | #28 |
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Name: NewWorlds
Home MUD: New Worlds
Posts: 1,425
|
Re: Moderation
I'm inclined to agree with this. There seems to be a lot of ego with many of us who are either Admins ourselves or staff members of muds or moderators. I do believe though and have seen both in private messages and in public posts that Lasher is really working hard to bring everything together with his new team and I will give him the chance to do so and try to be a positive part of this development following Molly's suggestion of respect.
In fairness to Crat, he does sometimes seem a bit crass, but I believe that is his sarcasm and perhaps this is the case with many of us. I think we forget sometimes that we are all on the same team, as it were, and that is to make a community of staff and players that want to enjoy MUD style games and MUD style environments. |
08-29-2007, 10:48 AM | #29 |
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Name: Derek
Location: Orlando
Posts: 357
|
Re: Moderation
Well said. I think most would agree we'd like to attract more people to MUDs in general. On this forum we are like the proverbial family in-fighting constantly, except on this forum the whole world can see our discussions if they choose to look.
What impression of MUDs does an interested third party coming to the forum from Google because they happened to search on "Gold Dragon" (or whatever) come away with? |
08-29-2007, 10:56 AM | #30 |
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Name: Derek
Location: Orlando
Posts: 357
|
Re: Moderation
It could, and if a moderator finds themselves thinking they would moderate my post if it were from someone other than me then please, moderate it, and give me the same reason why you would give anyone else.
The only way I can really know if our moderation is 'fair', 'appropriate', 'just right', 'heavy handed' or whatever is to experience it. As Brody stated, it's going to take some time to find the right balance and we can only ask for patience in the meatime. |
08-29-2007, 11:11 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
Make me a mod. You'll solve the problem of me being a rebel
(since I'll be inside the walls) and you'll get to feel first hand what moderation is like, since I'll be every bit as consistent with you as your mods have been with me. -Crat |
08-29-2007, 12:23 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 315
|
Re: Moderation
What works for me is to simply not go back any pages, and that way I'll never know one of my posts got deleted, nor get angry, nor have a hissy fit and leave the forum which would leave a lot of people coming here from TIC just to get a sniff of my literal prowess very sad and depressed.
The only thing that is required is for moderators to not delete the steady stream of spam and nonsense I spit forth until it has scrolled off of the last page. And given how everyone here claims to be considerate and respectful, that seems like a small favor to ask for. Ignorance is bliss. |
08-29-2007, 12:44 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: United Socialist States of America
Home MUD: SmaugMuds.org
Home MUD: Arthmoor MUD Hosting
Posts: 249
|
Re: Moderation
Scandum, while the humor is not lost on me, the analogy is broken for one very important reason: TMS is not the government and cannot be guilt of censorship in that sense. Nor could it be considered the gestapo for removing posts. TMS is a private entity and is thus not subject to the protections of the 1st amendment. I know. Shocking. But the Bill of Rights was specifically directed at preventing GOVERNMENT from engaging in censorship and other such nasty business. The 1st amendment specifically designed to prevent them from restricting political speech.
A private entity, like TMS, or say... your employer, can restrict what you say, when you say it, who you say it to, and take action to punish you if you violate the rules. Your recourse? In TMS's case, PM the moderator of the forum or the board admins and make your case. In your employer's case, hire a civil attorney and file suit. At least arguing your case with TMS is free |
08-29-2007, 04:07 PM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
Got my second vague "warning" in a private message today.
Since a warning implies consequences, I can only assume I'm being threatened with banishment. That would be some sad stuff right there, if "patience" were asked of users but I got kicked for insufficient piety. -Crat |
08-29-2007, 04:21 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 849
|
Re: Moderation
See it's like this, craytus. Lasher runs this joint. He gets to make the rules. He also gets to break them if he wants to. He can post, in his own thread, "You all, personally and intimately, suck. And yes I mean you." And he can toggle his thread so no one can respond. He can siteban anyone who opens their own thread to respond. He can shut the whole damned site down if he gets too many people to respond, and he can remove the whole forum, and leave only a banner on the main webpage, reading, in enormous bold, italicized, underlined red letters, "You all, personally and intimately, suck. And yes I mean you."
Is it being a hypocrite? Nope. It's being "the guy who runs the joint." I run my own household. Therefore, I get to make the rules, and I can break them whenever I damned well feel like it, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to get your shrimp scampi for supper elsewhere. I'm not even intending to imply that Lasher is breaking any of the rules; because a little off-topic banter that is appreciated by EVERYONE EXCEPT FOR YOU is fine and dandy as far as I'm concerned. But again, it isn't my place to decide. Because...I don't run the joint. I'm just a visitor. And if I ever get tired of visiting, I'll take my ball and go home like a good little girl. I suggest you do the same, instead of working yourself up to an aneurism over it. |
08-29-2007, 04:40 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
Between you and Samson repeating
this to me, I get the feeling that you guys think Lasher is in charge around here and gets to decide how the place is run. I'd like you to consider that I probably know that, and that this point is not in debate. Perhaps we can, you know, get past it. You may not have realized it, but I was not objecting to Lasher's tangent. I was pointing out that he is presumed to have that liberty, while am not. If we agree that I know Lasher is in charge, and we can accept that I'm not against the natural flow of threads tangenting on occasion, then I guess it sounds like you think I should just shut up. I don't know how many people you speak for. Let's assume you speak for everyone, and the consensus is that I should really just shut up. I guess we can expect the axe to fall soon, then. On the other hand, suppose there are other people who have received secret warnings, suppose there are those who don't mind debating these issues but don't dare incur the enmity of the admins? I guess they're doing what they should, too, and just shutting up about it. If that's the kind of forum TMS is to be, then so be it. I'll keep getting told by folks like you to keep my place, I'll keep getting threats from mods to mind my manners, and eventually I'll just get kicked as being too troublesome, and the sun will rise the next day and the birds will sing. So just hang in there, Jazuela. And if it's not too much to ask, please spell my name correctly. -Cratylus |
08-29-2007, 04:41 PM | #37 |
Legend
|
Re: Moderation
Crat, you're not helping your position at all. The moderators are trying to handle this with you via private messages. If you insist on trying to use that as fodder for continued griping about moderation of the forums, it's just going to make matters worse for you - and implying that The Man is out to get you isn't helping, either.
I don't think the warnings are vague at all, and neither are the consequences. No one wants to see you gone - you've been a valuable contributor here. But we do have to play by Lasher's rules. |
08-29-2007, 05:19 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
I appreciate that you're trying to help, and I understand
that the moderation is done with the best intentions. However, I do not know who is in charge of what, and who has what authority. For all I know, someone that is not Lasher sending me private warnings is overstepping their authority. I feel more comfortable being chastised in public, where the cleansing scrutiny of the community can discern how just my castigation is. Not sure how it could be worse, really, other than an outright ban. Keep in mind I'm not trying to get deleted. I'm not trying to get banned. I'm speaking my mind in good faith and have been doing so in keeping with what my understanding of the mission of the site is/was. Now that the rules are less unwritten, perhaps there is hope for clearer understandings, but I doubt there will be fewer clashes, because I as a person of good will, and the moderators as people of good will, differ on the usefulness and appropriateness of moderation of some of my posts or parts thereof. It's an honest disagreement, not a defiant manifesto. And as such, I don't see it being resolved, because I don't have anything to gain by compromising my position that the moderation around here has been out of hand, and I'm just not inclined to let it slide if it continues to be so. So I don't see how it gets worse. Looks like I'm on a rocket sled to bantown, the only question is when. Sometimes I amuse myself with fiery rhetoric. We are having fun here, after all, or is this site supposed to be Serious Business? I understand. At some point the moderation team will get sick of me. I'm sorry for that, because I enjoy participating here. I think it's right of me to speak my mind on these points, and I think it's ok that I not go gently into that good night. You guys will have to decide what kind of site to be. -Crat |
08-29-2007, 05:30 PM | #39 |
Legend
|
Re: Moderation
While you might prefer public castigation (despite suggesting it was wrong for people to do that to ME in the n00biest n00b thread), the new approach of the moderation team is to try to handle these differences privately rather than having it devolve into a battle of egos.
Lasher can speak for himself on the matter of our authority, but I can assure you that whoever contacted you earlier was doing so with Lasher's full knowledge and consent. |
08-29-2007, 05:36 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
|
Re: Moderation
I do not see that position espoused by me in that thread.
Was it deleted? I do not remember making it. Please clarify. -Crat |