MUD Administration

Netwyrm · 07-29-2005, 11:04 PM

I am wrapping something up for browser usage, for which I have an out of band signalling channel requirement. I can't use 80, though that is just about guaranteed to be open, because I'm already using that in the browser.

In testing, some folks have had to open ports, which is uncomfortable for many users. Thus, I have been trying to decide which port would be most welcome.

Many MUDs run on telnet. Should I put my out of band channel on that port, even though I am not using the telnet protocol, given that many MUD players will already have it open? Or is that just asking for other trouble?

Has anyone had to run two channels in their game before? I don't want players to have firewall issues, but also don't want to abuse ports.

Kylotan · 07-31-2005, 07:24 AM

You seem to have something mistaken - you don't need to open ports on the local machine to connect to a remote system. ie. you don't need port 23 open locally in order to connect to a telnet server elsewhere. Is this a peer-to-peer system or just a standard client-server one? If these people have firewalls that block outgoing connections based on destination port, then telling them to allow connections to those ports (which is not really 'opening' them) constitutes virtually no security risk whatsoever.

Netwyrm · 07-31-2005, 01:40 PM

Comfort level with ports - Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New: Roleplay Exp toward Level	Fern	MUD Announcements	22	03-21-2006 09:35 PM
Preferred Role Playing Level	enigma@zebedee	Advertising for Players	27	04-23-2003 07:01 AM
Getting off ground level...	Azeroth	MUD Administration	8	04-17-2003 12:46 PM
Level 65 Trust	Nostrum	Newbie Help	9	10-23-2002 01:45 AM
Class or Level System?	tresspassor	Roleplaying and Storytelling	4	07-08-2002 12:11 PM

07-29-2005, 11:04 PM	#1
Netwyrm New Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: San Rafael, CA Posts: 14	I am wrapping something up for browser usage, for which I have an out of band signalling channel requirement. I can't use 80, though that is just about guaranteed to be open, because I'm already using that in the browser. In testing, some folks have had to open ports, which is uncomfortable for many users. Thus, I have been trying to decide which port would be most welcome. Many MUDs run on telnet. Should I put my out of band channel on that port, even though I am not using the telnet protocol, given that many MUD players will already have it open? Or is that just asking for other trouble? Has anyone had to run two channels in their game before? I don't want players to have firewall issues, but also don't want to abuse ports.

07-31-2005, 07:24 AM	#2
Kylotan Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Nottingham, UK Home MUD: Abattoir (Smaug) Home MUD: ex-Jellybean (Smaug) Home MUD: ex-Dark Chambers (Merc) Posts: 174	You seem to have something mistaken - you don't need to open ports on the local machine to connect to a remote system. ie. you don't need port 23 open locally in order to connect to a telnet server elsewhere. Is this a peer-to-peer system or just a standard client-server one? If these people have firewalls that block outgoing connections based on destination port, then telling them to allow connections to those ports (which is not really 'opening' them) constitutes virtually no security risk whatsoever.

07-31-2005, 01:40 PM	#3
Netwyrm New Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: San Rafael, CA Posts: 14

MUD Administration

Comfort level with ports