10-05-2003, 10:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 28
 |
First, a quick question.. In ROM, when you want to add affects the syntex is :
addapp type <numder> addaff none 0 <spell> (for a spell to not show on Ident) addaff none 1 <spell> (for spell to show in Ident) Are these correct? What am I missing, for vuln and such? Also, adding these affects to objs, what do you think is good. What do you think is to much? Anyone have a base balance they go by, whether it be per level, or just per area, or per obj? Any thoughts on this would be fantastic! - Haley |
|
10-06-2003, 12:23 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: My laptop, my apt, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Posts: 42
|
I am fairly sure on this...
the addaff command in stock ROM is broken. you have to fix it to work. else, modify the items with OLC and load them, but that makes all items the same instead of individual ones different. |
|
10-06-2003, 10:04 AM
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 28
|
the addaff command works, I was just making sure I was using the right codes.
I wanted to know how what people thought was too much extra ads to eq and objs, and what was good or not enough. |
Adding Affects - Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding new areas | Kariyana | MUD Coding | 1 | 01-18-2003 12:12 AM |
| Adding new zones | Danlor | MUD Coding | 3 | 08-27-2002 09:18 AM |
| Adding restrictions to Backstab | Jaegar | MUD Coding | 3 | 07-29-2002 08:44 AM |
| What OLC do you prefer adding code support for? | Ostoles | MUD Coding | 4 | 06-28-2002 10:40 PM |
